Software development project consulting +33 0689658898

Advisory firm

Counsel for software development projects

We help management decide what to build, how the work should be run, and where the technical risk sits. The advice is independent of the team that writes the code.


Practice

Where we are brought in

Engagements start before a large build, or when a project already underway needs a clearer brief.

01

Project definition

We turn a business aim into a scope, a sequence of releases, and a budget range management can approve. The brief names what is in the first release, what waits, and what would make the project larger than intended.

02

Delivery structure

We advise how the work should be staffed, governed, and reported, so progress is visible to the people paying for it. That includes who decides scope changes, how often management sees status, and what “done” means for each release.

03

Technical choices

We review architecture, vendors, and build-or-buy options, and say which decisions are hard to reverse. The note is written for a non-technical sponsor as well as for the people who will live with the system.

04

Steering through delivery

We stay on as an advisor while the project is built, and flag scope, cost, and risk before they become surprises. We do not manage the developers day to day. We keep the original decision in view.

Situations

When a company usually calls

The project is real, the budget is about to be committed, and management wants a view that does not come from the team asking for the money.

A build is about to be approved

Leadership has a proposal and needs to know whether the scope, the sequence, and the cost range are sound enough to start.

An internal team and a vendor disagree

Two parties describe the same system differently. We read both accounts and say where the disagreement actually sits.

A project has slipped

Dates have moved more than once. We look at scope, staffing, and decisions that were left open, and say what has to change for the next date to hold.

A system has to be replaced

The old software still runs the business. We help set what the replacement must do first, and what can stay on the old system for a while.

What you receive

Written advice, not a slide that disappears

Every engagement ends with a document the sponsor can keep. The form depends on the question.

A project brief

Scope, release order, assumptions, and the decisions still open. Written so a board or an owner can approve a start.

A decision note

The options, the one we recommend, and the cost of changing that choice later. Used for vendors, architecture, and build-or-buy.

A steering note

What moved since the last review, what is at risk, and what management should decide this month. Used while a build is underway.

Approach

A short engagement, with a written view

We do not sell software licenses or staff a development team. The work product is advice: a brief, a recommendation, or a steering note.

Each engagement has a named client contact and an agreed end date. Materials stay with the client. We do not keep a copy of source code, customer data, or commercial terms beyond what the brief requires.

If the question is smaller than a full review, we say so on the first call and suggest a shorter piece of work.

  1. Conversation Call +33 0689658898 and describe the project, the decision you need, and the date it is due.
  2. Brief We confirm the question, the people we will speak with, and what we will deliver.
  3. Review We read the materials, speak with the owners of the work, and write the recommendation.
  4. Close We present the view to management and leave a document they can use after we step back.

The firm

Tereza Gardonova

Tereza Gardonova is a consulting practice for software development projects. Clients are companies that need an outside view before they commit budget, or while a build is in motion.

The practice reports to management. It does not replace the engineers, the product owner, or the vendor. It makes the project easier to govern.

Typical sponsors are an owner, a managing director, or the person accountable for the technology budget. The people who build the system are interviewed. They are not the client of the advice.

Work covers new products, replacements of systems already in use, and projects shared between an internal team and an outside supplier. Industry is less important than whether the decision is large enough to need a written view.

Questions

What clients ask before the first call

Do you write the software?

No. The practice advises on the project. Building, testing, and operating the system stay with the client’s team or its vendor.

How long does an engagement take?

A decision note is often a few weeks. Steering through an active build is agreed month by month, with an end date written down. The first call is used to say which of those fits.

Who do you need to speak with?

The sponsor, and the people who own the scope, the budget, and the system as it is today. We do not need the whole company in the room.

What should we send before we talk?

A short description of the project, the decision you need, and the date it is due. Proposals and plans can follow after the call, once we know they are relevant.

Can you work alongside a vendor we already chose?

Yes. The advice stays independent of that vendor. If a choice is already fixed, we say what that choice commits you to, rather than reopening it for its own sake.

Contact

Speak with the practice

Call with the project name, the decision you need, and when you need it.

  • Firm Tereza Gardonova
  • Practice Software development project consulting
  • Phone +33 0689658898
  • On the call The project, the decision you need, and when you need the written view.

This page has no inbox. Call +33 0689658898 to arrange the conversation.